The PGMOL’s handling of William Saliba’s red card, while correct under the DOGSO rule, exposes the glaring inconsistencies in officiating decisions. Similar incidents, like those involving Tosin and Van de Ven, were treated entirely differently despite appearing almost identical in context.
The PGMOL’s handling of William Saliba’s red card, while correct under the DOGSO rule, exposes the glaring inconsistencies in officiating decisions. Similar incidents, like those involving Tosin and Van de Ven, were treated entirely differently despite appearing almost identical… pic.twitter.com/Z9mnwuZAIN
— Terry Flewers (@terryflewers) November 15, 2024
This lack of uniformity raises serious questions about fairness and consistency. Coupled with controversies like those involving David Coote, it’s hard to avoid the conclusion that the PGMOL is not fit for purpose.
Refereeing decisions feel arbitrary, lacking accountability or clear explanations, leaving fans frustrated and skeptical. Until the PGMOL prioritises consistency, transparency, and accountability, the league’s integrity will remain in question, and accusations of bias will only grow louder.
